Young v. Berkebile

Filing 4

ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/7/13. (dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01626-BNB
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,
Applicant,
v.
WARDEN BERKEBILE,
Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Applicant Timothy Doyle Young is in the custody of the United States Bureau of
Prisons and currently is incarcerated at ADX in Florence, Colorado. Applicant, acting
pro se, initiated this action by submitting a pleading titled, “Habeas Corpus.” In an order
entered on July 2, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland directed Applicant, as he
has done on numerous prior occasions, to file his claims on a Court-approved form
used in filing a habeas action and to submit a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave
to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and a certified
account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account. Magistrate
Judge Boland also directed Applicant that if he is unable to obtain the necessary forms
and a certified account statement he must provide evidence that he submitted a request
for each item and prison staff responded telling him they would not provide the items.
Magistrate Judge Boland warned Applicant that the action would be dismissed
without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. Applicant
now has failed to comply with the July 2 Order within the time allowed, and the action

will be dismissed.
The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from
this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be
denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438
(1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee
or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Application is denied and the action is dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure deficiencies and for failure
to prosecute. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 7th day of

August , 2013.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court

2