Jordan v. Cooley, et al
Filing
57
Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Carriage Park Condo, City of Aurora, D. Cooley, Dennis Houck, J. Van Kamp against Aaron Jordan re: 56 Order, by Clerk on 3/10/2014. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01650-REB-MJW
AARON JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
D. COOLEY #302595,
CITY OF AURORA (official capacity suit),
J. VAN KAMP #25337,
CARRIAGE PARK CONDO ASSOCIATION, and
PRESIDENT DENNIS HOUCK,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Order Granting Motions to Dismiss of Judge Robert E.
Blackburn entered on March 10, 2014 it is
ORDERED that under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), (5), and (6), Defendants
Carriage Park Homeowners Association’s and Dennis Houck, President of
Carriage Park HOA’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and
12(b)(6) [#12] filed July 18, 2013, is GRANTED;
FURTHER ORDERED that under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), (4), and (5), the
Aurora Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12 (b) (4)
and (5) for Insufficiency of Process and of Service of Process [#14] filed August 5,
2013, is GRANTED;
FURTHER ORDERED that all claims asserted in the complaint [#1] are
DISMISSED without prejudice;
FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for the defendants, D.
Cooley #302595, City of Aurora (official capacity suit), J. Van Kamp #25337, Carriage
Park Condo Association, and President Dennis Houck, against the plaintiff, Aaron
Jordan; and
FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants are AWARDED their costs to be
taxed by the clerk of the court in the time and manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(d)(1) D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 10th day of March, 2014.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/
Kathleen Finney
Kathleen Finney
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?