Green v. Colvin

Filing 12

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/30/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/5/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/20/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 9/24/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01686-AP
JANE DIANE GREEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado

James Lawrence Burgess
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout St., Ste. 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed:

June 26, 2013

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office:
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:
4.

July 5, 2013
September 3, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge the Record is complete.
Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, the Record is complete.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff states: None anticipated
Defendant states: None anticipated.

6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims
or defenses.
Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual
claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS
Plaintiff states: None anticipated
Defendant states: None anticipated.

The Parties state that this case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand from
the United States District Court.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due:

October 30, 2013

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

December 5, 2013

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

December 20, 2013

The parties have agreed to extend the due date for the Commissioner’s Response Brief and
the Plaintiff’s Reply Brief because of the Thanksgiving holiday.
9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.
B. Defendant's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.

( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.

B.

(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 24th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane_____________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:
s/Gail C. Harriss
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

For Defendant:
By: s/ James L. Burgess
James Lawrence Burgess
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout St., Ste. 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]