Colosky v. Colvin
Filing
12
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER ). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/12/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/11/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/26/2013. by Judge John L. Kane on 9/16/2013. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01696-AP
Melanie L. Colosky,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Anthony Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
(719) 260-3842
asokolow@asokolow.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
(303) 844-0815
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
J.B. García
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).
-1-
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: July 9, 2013
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: June 27, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: September 9, 2013
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
This case involves a new application filed. To the best of the parties’ knowledge, this case has
not previously been before this Court.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: November 12, 2013
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: December 11, 2013
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 26, 2013
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement:
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
-2-
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
( x ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 16th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/ Anthony L. Sokolow
/s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Anthony Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
Telephone: (719) 260-3842
asokolow@asokolow.com
By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 800294-4003
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?