Colosky v. Colvin

Filing 12

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER ). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/12/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/11/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/26/2013. by Judge John L. Kane on 9/16/2013. (trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01696-AP
Melanie L. Colosky,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:

Anthony Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
[phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney

Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]

J.B. García
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).

-1-

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: July 9, 2013

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: June 27, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: September 9, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
This case involves a new application filed. To the best of the parties’ knowledge, this case has
not previously been before this Court.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: November 12, 2013

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: December 11, 2013

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 26, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement:

B.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
-2-

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

( x ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

B.

( ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 16th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Anthony L. Sokolow

/s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley

Anthony Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 800294-4003
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

-3-