Wilder v. Federal Corrections Officers 1-10 et al

Filing 53

ORDER. Ordered that on or before May 5, 2014, Ms. Turner shall file with the court under Restriction Level 3 the last known address of Warden Daniels or, in the alternative, a notification that the BOP does not possess any address for him. Ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Attorney Advisor Kaitlin Turner at the BOP Colorado Consolidated Legal Center by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/21/14. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 13-cv-01701-PAB-BNB CHRISTOPHER JAMES WILDER, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS (Warden), and BORGES, (Lieutenant), Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The plaintiff filed his Fourth Amended Prisoner Complaint on March 28, 2014 [Doc. #47]. He names as a defendant Warden Charles Daniels. On April 2, 2014, the court sent a request for waiver of service to the defendants at the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) Colorado Consolidated Legal Center [Doc. #48]. On April 11, 2014, BOP Attorney Advisor Kaitlin Turner filed a document stating that service is not waived for defendant Daniels because he is “not located in [the] District of Colorado.” IT IS ORDERED: (1) On or before May 5, 2014, Ms. Turner shall file with the court under Restriction Level 3 the last known address of Warden Daniels or, in the alternative, a notification that the BOP does not possess any address for him; and (2) The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Attorney Advisor Kaitlin Turner at the BOP Colorado Consolidated Legal Center. Dated April 21, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?