Bailey v. City of Englewood et al
ORDER adopting Recommendation Of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 81 ). Plaintiff's Contested Motion to Amend Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 62 ) is DENIED. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/11/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13BcvB01715BRM-BNB
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF No. 81)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (“Recommendation”) (ECF No. 81) to deny Plaintiff’s Contested Motion to Amend Second
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 62) due to his undue delay in asserting the proposed additional
claims. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by this reference. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Magistrate Judge advised the parties they had fourteen days after the service of a copy
of the Recommendation to serve and file written objections to the Recommendation. The time
permitted for any objections has expired and no objections to the Recommendation have been
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion, and relevant portions of
the Court’s file, and concludes the Magistrate Judge’s analysis was thorough and sound, and that
there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee’s
Notes (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also Summers v. Utah,
927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may
review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”). It is therefore
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 81) is ACCEPTED and
ADOPTED in its entirety; and
2. Plaintiff’s Contested Motion to Amend Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 62) is
DATED this 11th day of July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?