Brown et al v. Perez

Filing 74

COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Judge Raymond P. Moore: Trial Preparation Conference held on 9/3/2014. 66 Plaintiff's Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice is DENIED. Hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment, Docket Entries 41 and 52 , is set for 9/9/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Raymond P. Moore. Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt. (cpear) Modified on 9/4/2014 to correct text (cpear).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE RAYMOND P. MOORE Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Pearson Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt CASE NO. Date: September 3, 2014 13-cv-01722-RM-MJW BLAKE BROWN, DEAN BIGGS, JACQUELINE DEHERRERA, RUTH ANN HEAD, MARLENE MASON, ROXANNE S. MCFALL, RICHARD MEDLOCK, and BERNADETTE SMITH, John Evangelisti Karen Larson Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, and THOMAS E. PEREZ, Timothy Jafek Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE COURT IN SESSION: 1:31 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion held regarding the pending Motions for Summary Judgment, exhibit and witness lists, sequestration of witnesses at trial, Plaintiff’s Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice (Doc. 66, filed 8/15/14), the Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Order Permitting Discovery (Doc. 15, filed 9/24/13), and setting a hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment. Witnesses will not be sequestered during the trial. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice (Doc. 66, filed 8/15/14) is DENIED as stated on the record. A hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41, filed 2/26/14) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52, filed 2/26/14) is set for September 9, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. COURT IN RECESS: Total in court time: Hearing concluded 1:44 p.m. 00:13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?