Aragon v. Colvin
Filing
9
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/17/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/16/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/1/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/3/14. (mfiel, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01725-AP
Larry L. Aragon,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
James R. Koncilja
Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C.
125 W. B St.
Pueblo, CO 81003
719- 543-9591
kandkpc@comcast.net
For Defendant:
Christina J. Valerio
Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Region VIII
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone 303-844-7328
Facsimile 303-844-0770
christina.valerio@ssa.gov
Attorneys for the Defendant
-1-
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 21, 2013
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: July 1, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 13, 2014
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of their knowledge, both parties state that the record is complete and adequate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
Both parties state that this case does not involve unusually complicated or out of the ordinary
claims.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
Both parties raise no other matters before the Court
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 17, 2014
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 16, 2014
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 1, 2014
-2-
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
10.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
B.
11.
(
)
All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
( x ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 3rd day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-3-
APPROVED:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
s/James R. Koncilja
s/Christina J. Valerio
Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C.
125 W. B. St.
Pueblo, CO 81003
kandkpc@comcasr.net
Attorney for Plaintiff
By: Christina J. Valerio
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
christina.valerio@ssa.gov
Attorneys for the Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?