Aragon v. Colvin

Filing 9

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/17/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/16/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/1/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 2/3/14. (mfiel, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-01725-AP Larry L. Aragon, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: James R. Koncilja Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C. 125 W. B St. Pueblo, CO 81003 719- 543-9591 For Defendant: Christina J. Valerio Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Region VIII 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294 Telephone 303-844-7328 Facsimile 303-844-0770 Attorneys for the Defendant -1- 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 21, 2013 C. 4. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 1, 2013 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 13, 2014 STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of their knowledge, both parties state that the record is complete and adequate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Neither party intends to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES Both parties state that this case does not involve unusually complicated or out of the ordinary claims. 7. OTHER MATTERS Both parties raise no other matters before the Court 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 17, 2014 B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 16, 2014 C. Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 1, 2014 -2- 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Indicate below the parties' consent choice. A. B. 11. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. ( x ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 3rd day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -3- APPROVED: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY s/James R. Koncilja s/Christina J. Valerio Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C. 125 W. B. St. Pueblo, CO 81003 Attorney for Plaintiff By: Christina J. Valerio Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294 Attorneys for the Defendant -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?