Aragon v. Erlanger et al

Filing 17

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that on or before October 7, 2013, the defendants shall file with the court under Restricted Level 3 the last known address of Erlanger or, in the alternative, a notifice that they do not possess any address for Erlanger. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/25/13. (alvsl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No 13-cv-01726-RBJ-BNB RUBEN ARAGON, Plaintiff, v. ROSSKAMM ERLANGER, GUY EDMONDS, MITCHELL BUTTERFIELD, RHONDA FUNSTON, and JEFFREY HILL, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The plaintiff filed his Amended Prisoner Complaint on August 26, 2013 [Doc. #9] (the “Complaint”). He listed Rosskamm Erlanger as a defendant and stated that Erlanger was employed with the State of Colorado at all times pertinent to his claims. On September 4, 2013, the Clerk’s Office mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint and a request for waiver of service [Doc. #14] to the Colorado Department of Corrections (“DOC”) Office of Legal Affairs. On September 4, 2013, Teresa Reynolds, Legal Access Group Leader for the DOC Office of Legal Services, waived service for several defendants. Ms. Reynolds did not waive service for Erlanger. Ms. Reynolds explained that although Erlanger provided contract services for the DOC, he is not a DOC employee. Ms. Reynolds did not provide a last known address for Erlanger. IT IS ORDERED that on or before October 7, 2013, the defendants shall file with the court under Restricted Level 3 the last known address of Erlanger or, in the alternative, a notifice that they do not possess any address for Erlanger. Dated September 25, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?