Crouse v. City of Colorado Springs et al

Filing 16

MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that the City Defendants Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 5) Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 10] and the County Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint And Jury Demand (Doc. 5) Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), 12(b)(1) and (6) [ECF No. 11] are DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/05/13.(jjhsl, ) (Main Document 16 replaced on 8/5/2013) (jjhsl, ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01786-WYD-KMT
ROBERT C. CROUSE,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Colorado governmental entity;
THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, a local governmental
entity;
PETER CAREY, in his official capacity as the Chief of Colorado Springs Police
Department;
EL PASO COUNTY, a Colorado Governmental entity;
DAN MAY, in his official capacity as the District Attorney for El Paso County;
NICK BAYNE, in his official and individual capacity; and,
UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF THE COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, in
their official and individual capacities,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On Wednesday, July 31, 2013,
plaintiff, Robert C. Crouse, filed a First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 15]. Prior to this
filing, the defendants filed two separate motions to dismiss: (1) the City Defendants’
Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 5) Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)
And 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 10]; and, (2) the County Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Complaint And Jury Demand (Doc. 5) Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a),
12(b)(1) and (6) [ECF No. 11]. With the First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 15] now
being the operative pleading in this matter, it is
ORDERED that the City Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint
(Doc. 5) Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 10] and the County
Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint And Jury Demand (Doc. 5)
Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), 12(b)(1) and (6) [ECF No. 11] are DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: August 5, 2013.