Daro Tech, Ltd. v. Centerre Government Contracting Group, LLC et al

Filing 117

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/22/2014. (trlee, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01811-REB-KMT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of DARO TECH, LTD, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiffs, v. CENTERRE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, KIEWIT-TURNER A JOINT VENTURE, a joint venture doing business in Colorado, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND/ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, and THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before the court on the Stipulation of Dismissal of Case With Prejudice [#116]1 filed July 21, 2014. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. 1 “[#116]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal of Case With Prejudice [#116] filed July 21, 2014, is APPROVED; 2. That the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set November 14, 2014, are VACATED; 3. That the jury trial set to commence December 1, 2014, is VACATED; and 4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated July 22, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?