Daro Tech, Ltd. v. Centerre Government Contracting Group, LLC et al
Filing
117
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/22/2014. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01811-REB-KMT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of
DARO TECH, LTD, a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CENTERRE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company,
BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
KIEWIT-TURNER A JOINT VENTURE, a joint venture doing business in Colorado,
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation,
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation,
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND/ZURICH AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation, and
THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before the court on the Stipulation of Dismissal of Case With
Prejudice [#116]1 filed July 21, 2014. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I
conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be
dismissed with prejudice.
1
“[#116]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal of Case With Prejudice [#116] filed July
21, 2014, is APPROVED;
2. That the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set
November 14, 2014, are VACATED;
3. That the jury trial set to commence December 1, 2014, is VACATED; and
4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their
own attorney fees and costs.
Dated July 22, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?