George et al v. Urban Settlement Services et al.

Filing 38

MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Stay Discovery. Discovery is stayed pending adjudication of Defendant Urban Lending's 13 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s 14 Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint with the exception that Defendants shall supplement their initial disclosures on or before January 31, 2014 to identify each employee who handled each named Plai ntiff's loan modification(s) and workout request(s) on a substantive, individual loan-level basis, to the extent such people are identifiable from Defendants' loan files, and note (a) whether the identified employees are still employed by the respective Defendant and (b) if former employees, their last known addresses and telephone numbers. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/6/14.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01819-PAB-KLM
RICHARD GEORGE,
STEVEN LEAVITT,
SANDRA LEAVITT,
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
URBAN SETTLEMENT SERVICES doing business as Urban Lending Solutions, and
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to
Stay Discovery [#27]1 (the “Motion”). Defendant Urban Lending Solutions joined in the
Motion [#29] and Plaintiffs do not oppose the relief requested subject to Defendants’
agreement to make supplemental initial disclosures by January 31, 2014 [#31].
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#27] is GRANTED as follows: discovery
is STAYED pending adjudication of Defendant Urban Lending’s Motion to Dismiss First
Amended Class Action Complaint [#13] and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to
Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint [#14] with the exception that
Defendants shall supplement their initial disclosures on or before January 31, 2014 to
identify each employee who handled each named Plaintiff’s loan modification(s) and
workout request(s) on a substantive, individual loan-level basis, to the extent such people
are identifiable from Defendants’ loan files, and note (a) whether the identified employees
are still employed by the respective Defendant and (b) if former employees, their last
known addresses and telephone numbers.
Dated: January 6, 2014

1

“[#27]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.