Wallin v. Miller et al
Filing
18
Second ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/17/2013. (skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01868-BNB
OLOYEA D. WALLIN, a.k.a. DONALD OLOYEA WALLIN, a.k.a. OLOYEA WALLIN,
Applicant,
v.
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden of Crowley County Correctional Facility, and
JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
Respondents.
SECOND ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE
As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 submitted to the Court on July 11, 2013, the Court
determined that a limited Pre-Answer Response is appropriate pursuant to Rule 4 of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and to
Denson v. Abbott, 554 F. Supp.2d. 1206 (D. Colo. 2008). On August 23, 2013, the
Court entered an order directing Respondents to file a Pre-Answer Response within
twenty-one days. Respondents have failed to respond as directed. The Court again will
order Respondents to file a Pre-Answer Response and to explain the failure to respond
to the Court’s August 23, 2013 Order. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within seven days from the date of this Order Respondents
shall file a Pre-Answer that complies with the Court’s August 23, 2013 Order and
explain the failure to timely respond to the Court’s August 23,2013 Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of the PreAnswer Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires, in keeping with the August
23, 2013 Order.
Dated: September 17, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?