Lee v. Banuelos et al

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to file amended complaint; and denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration of order 6 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/21/13.(nmmsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01895-BNB
MARIO ANTON LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES DANIELS, Warden,
BERRY, Lieutenant,
BENUELOS, Lieutenant,
HAROLD WATTS, Administrator Remedy Coordinator,
UNKNOWN NAMED CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE
REMEDY COORDINATOR,
S. JARDIN, Administrative Remedy Coordinator,
J. WISEMAN, Officer,
M. EBENHART, Officer,
ERPS, Officer,
MOHLER, Officer,
UNKNOWN NAME INVESTIGATOR,
LITVAN, Lieutenant,
UNKNOWN NAMED TEAM MEMBERS,
THOMPSON, Nurse,
LEE, Officer,
SHORT, Officer,
MARTÍNEZ, Lieutenant,
COREY, Officer,
UNKNOWN NAME, Nurse Team Member,
SYNDER, Captain, and
ROY, Officer,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
This matter is before the Court on the letter (ECF No. 8) filed on August 16,
2013, in which Plaintiff seeks an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint
that complies with the order of July 19, 2013 (ECF No. 7). The request is GRANTED.
Plaintiff will be allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this minute order in which to
comply with the July 19 order. Failure to do so within the time allowed may result in the
dismissal of the instant action.

This matter also is before the Court on the motion (ECF No. 9) filed on August
20, 2013, asking the Court to reconsider the order (ECF No. 6) granting Plaintiff leave to
proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 because he alleges he is
litigating three lawsuits and has insufficient funds to buy stamps and photocopies
apparently necessary for litigation, as well as hygiene items. Plaintiff fails to provide
any authority in support of his request, and the Court is unaware of any. Therefore, the
motion is DENIED.
Dated: August 21, 2013