Lee v. Banuelos et al

Filing 36

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 34 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/21/14.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01895-CMA-MJW
MARIO ANTON LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
LIEUTENANT M. BANUELOS,
LIEUTENANT BARRY,
PRISON GUARD J. WISEMAN,
PRISON GUARD M. EBERHART,
PRISON GUARD ERPS,
PRISON GUARD MOHLER,
LIEUTENANT K. LITVAN,
CAROL LINGREN, RN,
R. HUDDLESTON, EMT, and
JOHN DOE, Unknown Medical Person[n]el Assigned to the Prison on the 2:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m. Shift on February 8, 2013,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (Docket No. 34) is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1 which
requires the proposed amended complaint to be attached to the subject motion. The
court recognizes that plaintiff is proceeding pro se, however plaintiff is still required to
follow the same rules as other litigants. See Nielsen v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th
Cir. 1994).
Date: February 21, 2014