Herblan v. Fairmount Fire Protection District et al

Filing 61

ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice as to Certain Defendants. ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims against Joel Hager and Don Angell With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(2) 60 is GRANTED. ORDERED that , pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all claims asserted against defendants Joel Hager and Don Angell are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear his or her own attorneys' fees and costs. ORDERED that Defendant Don Angell's Motion for Summary Judgment 37 and Defendant Don Angells Supplementation to Motion for Summary Judgment 57 are DENIED as moot by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/22/14.(jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01979-PAB-KMT
LAURA HERBLAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FAIRMOUNT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a Colorado Special District,
JOEL HAGER, and
DON ANGELL, in their official and individual capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to
Dismiss Claims against Joel Hager and Don Angell With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. Pro. 41(a)(2) [Docket No. 60]. Plaintiff represents that counsel for all parties agree
to the dismissal of all claims against Mr. Hager and Mr. Angell. The Court has reviewed
the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims against Joel
Hager and Don Angell With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(2) [Docket No.
60] is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all claims asserted against
defendants Joel Hager and Don Angell are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to
bear his or her own attorneys’ fees and costs. It is further

ORDERED that Defendant Don Angell’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket
No. 37] and Defendant Don Angell’s Supplementation to Motion for Summary Judgment
[Docket No. 57] are DENIED as moot.
DATED August 22, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

2