Carpenter et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
113
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 9/4/2014. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures 96 is DENIED. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for September 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. to discuss whether defense counsel is withdrawing their Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 89 . Counsel participating in the Telephone Conference sha ll initiate a conference call among themselves and then call the court at (303) 844-2117 at the scheduled time. Plaintiff's counsel must provide a supplemental report regarding the specific opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietzs rep ort by 12:00 p.m. on September 10, 2014. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery of John Haberland 102 is DENIED. This ruling is made from the bench and the time in which to file an objection starts from today's date. (amont) Modified on 9/4/2014 to add phone number for conference call (amont).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 13‐cv‐01986‐REB‐CBS
Date: September 4, 2014
Courtroom Deputy: Amanda Montoya
FTR – Reporter Deck‐Courtroom A402
Parties:
Counsel:
KIMBERLY CARPENTER,
KENNETH CARPENTER,
Richard Kaudy
Cajardo Lindsey
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Scott James
Aaron Goldman
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTIONS HEARING
Court in session: 01:55 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The Court addresses Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule
26(a)(2) Disclosures [96].
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule
26(a)(2) Disclosures [96] is DENIED.
The Court addresses Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant
to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89]. The Court asks counsel if they view this motion as a dispositive
motion. Defense counsel does not view this as a dispositive motion. Plaintiff’s counsel views
this motion as a dispositive motion.
Plaintiff’s counsel retracts opinion about Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony as
being a dispositive motion.
The Court recommends defense counsel withdraw Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of
Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89] and that Plaintiff provide a supplemental report
regarding the specific opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietz’s report.
ORDERED:
A Telephonic Status Conference is set for September 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. to
discuss whether defense counsel is withdrawing their Motion to Exclude Expert
Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89].
Plaintiff’s counsel must provide a supplemental report regarding the specific
opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietz’s report by 12:00 p.m. on
September 10, 2014.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery of John Haberland [102] is DENIED. This
ruling is made from the bench and the time in which to file an objection starts
from today’s date.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess: 03:22 p.m.
Total time in court: 01:27
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
(303) 825‐6119 or toll free at 1‐800‐962‐3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?