Carpenter et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 113

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 9/4/2014. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures 96 is DENIED. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for September 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. to discuss whether defense counsel is withdrawing their Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 89 . Counsel participating in the Telephone Conference sha ll initiate a conference call among themselves and then call the court at (303) 844-2117 at the scheduled time. Plaintiff's counsel must provide a supplemental report regarding the specific opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietzs rep ort by 12:00 p.m. on September 10, 2014. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery of John Haberland 102 is DENIED. This ruling is made from the bench and the time in which to file an objection starts from today's date. (amont) Modified on 9/4/2014 to add phone number for conference call (amont).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer    Civil Action: 13‐cv‐01986‐REB‐CBS      Date: September 4, 2014  Courtroom Deputy: Amanda Montoya    FTR – Reporter Deck‐Courtroom A402    Parties: Counsel: KIMBERLY CARPENTER, KENNETH CARPENTER,   Richard Kaudy Cajardo Lindsey Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Scott James Aaron Goldman Defendant.   COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING:  MOTIONS HEARING  Court in session: 01:55 p.m.  Court calls case.  Appearances of counsel.    The Court addresses Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule  26(a)(2) Disclosures [96].    ORDERED:  Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Supplement Rule  26(a)(2) Disclosures [96] is DENIED.    The Court addresses Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant   to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89].  The Court asks counsel if they view this motion as a dispositive   motion.  Defense counsel does not view this as a dispositive motion.  Plaintiff’s counsel views   this motion as a dispositive motion.      Plaintiff’s counsel retracts opinion about Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony as   being a dispositive motion.    The Court recommends defense counsel withdraw Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of   Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89] and that Plaintiff provide a supplemental report   regarding the specific opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietz’s report.     ORDERED:          A Telephonic Status Conference is set for September 8, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. to  discuss whether defense counsel is withdrawing their Motion to Exclude Expert  Testimony of Robert Dietz Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 [89].  Plaintiff’s counsel must provide a supplemental report regarding the specific  opinions they intend to illicit from Robert Dietz’s report by 12:00 p.m. on  September 10, 2014.  Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery of John Haberland [102] is DENIED.  This  ruling is made from the bench and the time in which to file an objection starts  from today’s date.    HEARING CONCLUDED.    Court in recess: 03:22 p.m.  Total time in court: 01:27    To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at  (303) 825‐6119 or toll free at 1‐800‐962‐3345. 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?