Carpenter et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 118

ORDER granting 116 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Kenneth Carpenter Claims with prejudice. The claims of plaintiff, Kenneth Carpenter against defendant, American Family Insurance Company are dismissed with prejudice, with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/1/2014.(alowe)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 13-cv-01986-REB-CBS KIMBERLY CARPENTER, and KENNETH CARPENTER, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER DISMISSING KENNETH CARPENTER Blackburn, J. The matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Kenneth Carpenter Claims With Prejudice [#116]1 filed September 30, 2014. After reviewing the motion and the record, the court has concluded that the motion should be granted and the claims of plaintiff, Kenneth Carpenter, against defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Kenneth Carpenter Claims With Prejudice [#116] filed September 30, 2014, is GRANTED; 2. That the claims of plaintiff, Kenneth Carpenter, against defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each of 1 “[#116]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That plaintiff, Kenneth Carpenter, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated October 1, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?