Rocky Mountain Wild et al. v. Neil Kornze et al.
Filing
12
STRICKEN- ORDER granting 7 Motion to Intervene. By Judge John L. Kane on 11/4/13.(mnfsl, ) Modified on 11/4/2013 to add stricken pursuant to minute order entered 11/4/13 (mnfsl, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01988
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD,
GRAND CANYON TRUST,
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,
SIERRA CLUB,
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE,
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, and
LIVING RIVERS,
Petitioners,
v.
NEIL KORNZE, Principal Deputy Director, Bureau of Land Management, and
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,
Respondents,
and
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE,
Respondent Intervenor.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE, DOC. 7
Kane, J.
Per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) and 24(b), American Petroleum Institute’s
Motion to Intervene, Doc. 7, is GRANTED. Respondent Intervenor’s participation is not,
however, without limitation. Counsel for Federal Respondents and counsel for American
Petroleum Institute must confer before filing any motion, responsive filing, or brief to determine
whether their positions may be set forth in a consolidated fashion. Respondent Intervenor may
file separate motions, responsive filings, or briefs only to raise arguments or issues Federal
Respondents decline to raise in their filings. Any new arguments raised by Respondent
Intervenor must be germane to the claims raised by the original parties; arguments relating to
collateral issues will be stricken as immaterial. Any separate filings must include a Certificate of
Compliance, confirming compliance with this conferral requirement. The Certificate of
Compliance should also include a statement that the Federal Respondents’ position does not
adequately cover the issues Respondent Intervenor seeks to raise by way of supplemental filings.
DATED:
November 4, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
John L. Kane, U.S. Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?