Allen & Vellone, P.C. et al v. Pino et al

Filing 41

COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 1/16/2014, denying as premature and without prejudice 32 Defendant Pino's Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Rule 11 with Incorporated Memorandum of Law, and granting 37 Defendant Laurence J. Pino's Motion for Leave to File Reply. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-401. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

Civil Action: 13-cv-02002-RM-BNB
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Pearson

Date: January 16, 2014
FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401

Parties

Counsel

ALLEN & VELLONE, P.C., and
STRAUS & BOIES, LLP,

Matthew Wolf
Patrick Vellone

Plaintiffs,
v.
LAURENCE J. PINO and
ENVERGENT CORPORATION,

Laurence Pino

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
Court in session: 10:28 a.m.
Appearances of counsel.
The Court has reviewed Defendant Pino’s Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Rule 11 with
Incorporated Memorandum of Law, Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendant Laurence J.
Pino’s Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Rule 11, and Defendant Laurence J. Pino’s Motion
for Leave to File Reply.
ORDERED: Defendant Laurence J. Pino’s Motion for Leave to File Reply (Doc. 37, filed
1/13/14) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file Defendant
Laurence J. Pino’s Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc.
37-1).

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone]

Discussion held regarding Defendant Laurence J. Pino’s Verified Special Appearance and Sworn
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 10, filed 8/21/13) and Defendant
Pino’s Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Rule 11 with Incorporated Memorandum of Law
(Doc. 32, filed 12/9/13). The Court and parties determine that a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss
is needed prior to hearing the Rule 11 Motion.
ORDERED: For reasons stated on the record, Defendant Pino’s Motion for Sanctions for
Violation of Rule 11 with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 32, filed
12/9/13) is DENIED as premature and without prejudice. Defendant Pino is
granted leave to refile the motion, if necessary, after a ruling on the Motion to
Dismiss is entered.
Court in recess:

10:33 a.m.

Hearing concluded.

Total time in court:

00:05

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone]