Mason et al v. Fantasy LLC, et al

Filing 88

MINUTE ORDER denying 71 Motion for Leave; granting 76 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify; denying as moot 83 Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/2/2015.(tscha, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02020-RM-KLM JESSICA MASON, MICHELLE CROSS, ALLISON STEBBING, and JAME TENCZA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FANTASY, LLC, doing business as Fantasy Gentlemen’s Club, and KEVIN EARDLEY, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended/Supplemental Complaint and Jury Demand [#71] (the “Motion to Amend Complaint”); on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Statement of Additional Facts [#76] (the “Motion to Amend Response”); and on Defendant Fantasy, LLC’s Motion to Stay [#83]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend Response [#76] is GRANTED. Defendants’ First Amended Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Statement of Additional Facts [#76-1] is accepted for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Stay [#83] is DENIED as moot. Because there is now an automatic stay in this matter as to both Defendants pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, see [#82, #87], there is no need to determine whether the stay should be lifted as to Defendant Fantasy, LLC. See Minute Order [#85]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend Complaint [#71] is DENIED without prejudice due to the pending stay related to Defendants’ bankruptcy proceedings. Dated: April 2, 2015 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?