Dawson, et al v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

Filing 45

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, to Establish Deadline for Response and to Allow Additional Pages to Briefs by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/25/14.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13BcvB02030BCMABKMT

CLINTON J. DAWSON, and
JANELL DAWSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOLDMAN SACHS & COMPANY,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, to Establish Deadline for
Response and to Allow Additional Pages to Briefs” (Doc. No. 43, filed Feb. 21, 2014) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
The Motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks leave to file a Second Amended Complaint and
to set a deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended
Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc.
No. 43-1). Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended
Complaint no later than March 25, 2014.
The Motion is DENIED without prejudice to the extent it seeks to leave to file a motion to
dismiss and response in excess of the page limitations set forth in District Judge Christine M.
Arguello’s Practice Standards. See CMA Civ. Practice Standards III.A.1. The parties have
failed to demonstrate that this case is of “extrodinary complexity.” Id.
Dated: February 25, 2014