General Electric Company et al v. Galbiati

Filing 31

ORDER re 29 : defendant James Galbiati shall have to and including August20, 2014, within which to file the declaration required by this Court's order of July 18, 2014, 28 and the discovery deadline is extended to and including September 1 7, 2014. The request for clarification of the order is denied. As the plaintiffs recognize, the order is limited to any claim of an interest in whatever is James Galbiatis apparent interest in the ownership of the subject patent and does not require including whatever other interests or claims there may be, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/31/2014.(jsmit)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 13-cv-02053-RPM GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DATEX-OHMEDA INC., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES GALBIATI, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DECLARATION AND CLARIFICATION OF THE ORDER TO FILE DECLARATION _____________________________________________________________________ On consideration of the motion, filed July 29, 2014, (Doc.29) and the Plaintiffs’ opposition, filed July 30, 2014, (Doc.30) it is now ORDERED that the defendant James Galbiati shall have to and including August 20, 2014, within which to file the declaration required by this Court’s order of July 18, 2014, (doc. 28) and the discovery deadline is extended to and including September 17, 2014. The request for clarification of the order is denied. As the plaintiffs recognize, the order is limited to any claim of an interest in whatever is James Galbiati’s apparent interest in the ownership of the subject patent and does not require including whatever other interests or claims there may be. DATED: July 31st, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?