Citizen Awareness Project, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Filing
27
MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Vacate Final Pretrial Conference. Discovery due by 8/29/2014; Dispositive Motions due by 9/30/2014; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/8/2014; Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 12/15/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/25/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02127-WJM-BNB
CITIZEN AWARENESS PROJECT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and
Vacate Final Pretrial Conference [docket no. 25, filed April 25, 2014] (the “Motion”).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The deadline to serve written discovery
is to and including July 30, 2014. The discovery cut-off is extended to and including August 29,
2014. The dispositive motions deadline is extended to and including September 30, 2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for September 2, 2014, is
vacated and reset to December 15, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor,
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The
proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.6, is due
on or before December 8, 2014. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A.
Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b).
DATED: April 25, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?