Citizen Awareness Project, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service et al

Filing 31

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/25/14 re: Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Vacate Final Pretrial Conference 29 . The Motion is GRANTED. Discovery due by 10/29/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 12/1/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for December 15, 2014, is vacated and reset to 3/4/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/25/2015. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02127-WJM-BNB CITIZEN AWARENESS PROJECT, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Vacate Final Pretrial Conference [docket no. 29, filed August 25, 2014] (the “Motion”). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The discovery cut-off is extended to and including October 29, 2014. The dispositive motions deadline is extended to and including December 1, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for December 15, 2014, is vacated and reset to March 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.6, is due on or before February 25, 2015. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b). DATED: August 25, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?