Steiner v. Colvin

Filing 13

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/22/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/24/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/10/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 12/5/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02130-AP
MICHELLE L. STEINER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Michael W. Seckar
Attorney
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García

Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7101
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
[e-mail]
-1-

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: September 27, 2013

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: August 12, 2013

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: November 15, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties state that, to the best of their knowledge, the record is complete and accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate any additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not appear to raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties are not aware of any other matters.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties request a briefing schedule two weeks outside of the standard briefing schedule to
account for a large number of cases where answers were filed on the same day.
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: January 22, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: February 24, 2014

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: March 10, 2014

-2-

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

B.

( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 5th day of December, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

-3-