Bartowsheski v. Timme et al
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/13/13. (nmmsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02136-BNB
(The above civil action number must appear on all future papers
sent to the court in this action. Failure to include this number
may result in a delay in the consideration of your claims.)
MIKE BARTOWSHESKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN RAE TIMME,
HEARING OFFICER LT. TOPLESS,
SOTP DIRECTOR CHARLES OLIN,
SOTP THERAPIST(S) KRISTY STENZELL, and
SOTP THERAPIST(S) TOM NELSON,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY
Plaintiff, an inmate at the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility in Cañon City,
Colorado, has submitted a Prisoner Complaint. Plaintiff also has submitted a filing fee
payment in the amount of $350.00 as required pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
However, Plaintiff has failed to submit the additional $50.00 administrative fee
necessary to commence a civil action that became effective in this Court as of May 1,
2013. Plaintiff will be directed to cure this deficiency within thirty days if he wishes to
pursue his claims in this action. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order
must include the civil action number on this order. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiency designated above within thirty (30)
days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this
order must include the civil action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiency
within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed
without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice.
DATED August 13, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?