Hedin v. Amedisys Holding, L.L.C. et al

Filing 34

Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 23 Motion to Allow Amended Complaint And Jury Demand. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/18/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02150-REB-KLM PAUL HEDIN, Plaintiff, v. AMEDISYS HOLDING, L.L.C., and AMEDISYS WESTERN, L.L.C., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Amended Complaint And Jury Demand [#23] (the “Motion”). The parties are obligated to read, understand, and comply with all Local Rules of this Court. D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(b) requires, among other things, that “[a] party who files an opposed motion for leave to amend a pleading [ ] attach as an exhibit a copy of the proposed amended pleading which strikes through . . . the text to be deleted and underlines . . . the text to be added.” The proposed Amended Complaint [#23-2] attached to the Motion does not comply with Local Rule 15.1(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#23] is DENIED without prejudice. Dated: April 18, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?