Hedin v. Amedisys Holding, L.L.C. et al

Filing 34

Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 23 Motion to Allow Amended Complaint And Jury Demand. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/18/2014.(klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02150-REB-KLM
PAUL HEDIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMEDISYS HOLDING, L.L.C., and
AMEDISYS WESTERN, L.L.C.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Amended Complaint
And Jury Demand [#23] (the “Motion”). The parties are obligated to read, understand, and
comply with all Local Rules of this Court. D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(b) requires, among other
things, that “[a] party who files an opposed motion for leave to amend a pleading [ ] attach
as an exhibit a copy of the proposed amended pleading which strikes through . . . the text
to be deleted and underlines . . . the text to be added.” The proposed Amended Complaint
[#23-2] attached to the Motion does not comply with Local Rule 15.1(b). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#23] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: April 18, 2014