Sladek v. City of Colorado Springs, CO. et al

Filing 40

AMENDED MINUTE ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant El Paso County's Motion to Dismiss is due 11/29/2013 or, in accordance with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C, twenty-one (21) days after the Town of Palmer Lake Answers or Responds, whichever date comes first. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/18/2013. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02165-PAB-MEH
DENNIS SLADEK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO,
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL,
STEPHEN BACH,
EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO,
CITY OF FOUNTAIN, COLORADO,
TOWN OF GREEN MOUNTAIN FALLS, COLORADO,
TOWN OF MONUMENT, COLORADO,
TOWN OF WOODLAND PARK, COLORADO, and
TOWN OF PALMER LAKE, COLORADO,
Defendants.

AMENDED MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 18, 2013.
On October 16, 2013, Defendant El Paso County filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended
Complaint [docket #35], and Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clarification [docket # 37]. Plaintiff’s
Motion seeks a clarification of the Court’s October 3, 2013 Minute Order [docket #33], which
addressed deadlines for Plaintiff’s Responses to two other pending Motions to Dismiss [docket ##
25, 31]. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification is granted as follows. Consistent with the
deadlines for Plaintiff’s Responses to the two other pending Motions to Dismiss, Plaintiff’s
Response to Defendant El Paso County’s Motion to Dismiss is due November 29, 2013 or, in
accordance with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C, twenty-one (21) days after the Town of Palmer Lake
Answers or Responds, whichever date comes first.

1