Bugatti Fausett et al v. Osteotech, Inc.

Filing 39

ORDER of Dismissal re 38 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to any affected party. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/29/2014. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02170-REB-KLM
KARIN BUGATTI FAUSETT, and
EDDIE FAUSETT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
OSTEOTECH, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [#38]1
filed December 18, 2014. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that
the stipulation should be approved and this action should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [#38] filed December 18,
2014 is APPROVED;
2. That any pending motions are DENIED as moot;
3. That any hearings, including the telephonic setting conference, now set
January 6, 2015, are VACATED;
4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to any

1

“[#38]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

affected party.
Dated December 29, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2