Burgess v. Daniels et al
Filing
71
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants Charles Daniels, Paul A. Kastner and Paul A. Laird and against plaintiff Corey Burgess. ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety by Clerk on 12/29/14. (jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02191-PAB-CBS
COREY BURGESS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES DANIELS,
PAUL A. KASTNER and
PAUL M. LAIRD,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Orders [Docket Nos. 68 and 70] of United States District Judge
Philip A. Brimmer entered on September 22, 2014 and December 23, 2014, it is
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 40] is
granted. It is further
ORDERED that defendant Charles Daniels is dismissed from this case. It is
further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Kastner and Laird in their
official capacities are dismissed without prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Laird and Kastner in their
individual capacities are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
It is further
ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants Charles
Daniels, Paul A. Kastner and Paul A. Laird and against plaintiff Corey Burgess. It is
further
ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk
of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is
further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 29rd day of December, 2014.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
s/Jennifer Hawkins
Jennifer Hawkins
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?