Hach Company v. In-Situ, Inc.
Filing
166
ORDER denying 101 Defendant In-Situ, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 104 Hach Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 157 Hach's Motion to Strike New Factual Allegations In-Situ Advances for the First Time in its Response in Opposition to Hach's Motion for Summary Judgment. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 06/16/2015. (cbslc1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02201-CBS
HACH COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
IN-SITU, INC.
Defendant.
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
This civil action comes before the court on: (1) “Defendant In-Situ, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
Judgment,” (2) “Hach Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” and (3) Hach’s “Motion to Strike New
Factual Allegations In-Situ Advances for the First Time in its Response in Opposition to Hach’s Motion
for Summary Judgment.” The court has reviewed the Motions, the extensive briefing, the numerous
exhibits, the entire case file, the arguments presented at the hearing held on June 4, 2015, and the
applicable law and is sufficiently advised in the premises. The court concludes that neither party has
demonstrated that no genuine issue of material fact remains to be determined by a jury. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
“Defendant In-Situ, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (filed March 23, 2015) (Doc. #
101) is DENIED.
2.
“Hach Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (filed March 26, 2015) (Doc. # 104) is
DENIED.
3.
Hach’s “Motion to Strike New Factual Allegations In-Situ Advances for the First Time in its
Response in Opposition to Hach’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (filed May 14, 2015) (Doc. # 157) is
DENIED.
1
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 16th day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?