Bryant v. Bonner et al

Filing 21

FINAL JUDGMENT. re: Order on Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, by Deborah A. Hansen, Deputy Clerk on 5/6/2014. (dhans, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02212-WJM
JAMES BRYANT,
Applicant,
v.
BOBBY BONNER, Warden, Kit Carson Corr. Center, and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,
Respondents.

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and the Order on
Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez,
United States District Judge, on May 6, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1), filed by James Bryant on August 16, 2013, is DENIED
and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue because
Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. Governing Section 2254 Cases 11(a); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 483–85 (2000). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this
order would not be taken in good faith See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438

(1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $505 appellate
filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 6th day of May 2014.

BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/Deborah A. Hansen
Deborah A. Hansen, Deputy Clerk