Diaz Rodriguez et al v. Luna et al

Filing 25

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/1/2014. Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial Preparation Conference are set for 8/8/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Four (4) day Jury Trial set for 8/25/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/20/13. (rebsec, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02223-REB-KMT
NANCY DIAZ RODRIGUEZ, and
JAVIER PIMENTEL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN LUNA,
LETICIA JAEL RODRIGUEZ CISNEROS, and
AZTECA RANCH MARKET #3, INC.,
Defendants.

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER
Blackburn, J.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e), D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.3, and D.C.COLO.LCivR
43.1, the court enters this Trial Preparation Conference Order.
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That in order to resolve pretrial issues implicating Fed. R. Evid. 702, the
following procedural protocol shall be used:
a. That expert reports shall conform in substance to the requirements of
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) and shall contain and include the following:
1. a complete statement of each expert opinion to be expressed
and the bases and reasons therefor;
2. the facts, data, and other information considered by the witness
in forming each expert opinion;

3. any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for each
expert opinion;
4. the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications
authored by the witness within the preceding ten years, stated in a curriculum vitae
(“c.v.”);
5. the compensation to be paid the expert for the study and
testimony; and
6. a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as
an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years;
b. That all motions raising issues under Fed. R. Evid. 702 as codified and
construed shall be filed by April 29, 2014, and marshaled thereafter as prescribed by
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C.;
c. That for each putative expert witness with respect to whom the movant
objects for any reason, the movant shall provide the following:
1. whether the movant contends that the testimony of the expert is
unnecessary or irrelevant; and if so, why;
2. whether the movant objects to the qualifications of the witness;
and if so, why (stated in detail); and
3. whether the movant objects to any opinion to be offered by the
expert; and if so:
a. which opinion; and
b. the specific basis and authority for any objection stated
and presented in terms of Fed. R. Evid. 401 and/or 702(a), (b), (c), or (d), i.e., whether
the objection impugns the relevancy of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the
2

sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, whether the objection
impugns the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion,
or whether the objection impugns how the expert has applied the principles and
methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion; and
d. That for each putative expert witness whose necessity, qualifications, or
opinions are opposed by the movant, the party offering the expert shall provide in
response to the motion the following:
1. a c.v. for the expert;
2. a statement of each opinion to be offered by the expert that is
opposed by the movant; and
3. the relevance and bases for each allegedly objectionable
statement to be offered by the expert, including
a. the facts or data on which the expert relied in support of
the opinion made the focus and subject of objection;
b. the principles and methods on which the expert relied in
support of the opinion made the focus and subject of objection; and
c. how the expert has applied the principles and methods
reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion made the focus and subject of
objection;
2. That trial by jury shall commence August 25, 2014, at 8:30 a.m., in courtroom
A1001, located on the 10th Floor North, of the Alfred A. Arraj, United States Courthouse
Annex, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294, at which trial all parties shall appear in
person without further notice, order, or subpoena;
3. That the court reserves four (4) days for trial;
3

4. That counsel and any pro se party shall appear in courtroom A1001 on the first
day of trial at 8:00 a.m., to review and discuss with the courtroom deputy clerk and the
court, if necessary, any final details, arrangements, or requirements concerning the trial;
5. That a combined Trial Preparation Conference and Final Pretrial
Conference (conference) shall commence on August 8, 2014, at 3:00 p.m., in
courtroom A1001;
6. That the proposed Final Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District Court
ECF Procedures V.5.1, shall be presented for the approval of the court no later than
seven (7) days before the final pretrial conference, i.e. by August 1, 2014;
7. That lead counsel and any pro se party shall attend the conference;
8. That for use and consideration during the conference, the parties shall
prepare and submit a proposed Final Pretrial Order in the time, manner, and form
prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.3 and the “Instructions Final Pretrial Order” to Local
Rules of Practice - Forms
http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx; except
that the proposed Final Pretrial Order under section “7. EXHIBITS”shall not require the
parties to list the exhibits to be offered by each party as otherwise required under
subsection “a” (See instead, paragraph 8, infra.), and shall provide under subsection “b”
that copies of exhibits must be provided to opposing counsel or any pro se party no later
than 45 days before trial and that objections to the exhibits must be served by personal
delivery, electronic mail, or facsimile no later than 30 days before trial;
9. That at the outset of the conference, the parties shall submit one Parties’ Joint
Exhibit List on the form required by the court (an original for the court with copies for the
courtroom deputy clerk, the court reporter, and all other parties) and in addition to the
4

information required to be submitted under section “6. WITNESSES” of the final pretrial
order, each party shall submit on the Witness List form required by the court (an original
for the court with copies for the courtroom deputy clerk and all other parties) a “will call”
witness list enumerating the name and address (city or county and state only) of each
witness that will be called and a “may call” witness list enumerating the name and
address (city or county and state only) of each witness that may be called; provided,
furthermore, that the “will call” witness list constitutes a representation on which the
court and every other party may rely that the “will call” witnesses listed will be present
and available to testify during trial;
10. That before commencement of jury selection, the parties shall submit to the
courtroom deputy clerk the exhibits identified in their joint exhibit list (a set of original
exhibits for use by the witnesses and copies for the court and all other parties);
11. That at the conference the parties shall be prepared to review and discuss,
inter alia, the following:
a. the proposed Final Pretrial Order;
b. stipulated and proposed jury instructions and verdict forms;
c. voir dire questions;
d. the jury selection process and the use of juror questionnaires;
e. identification of all persons permitted to be seated at each party’s table;
f. the pronunciation of problematic party’s and witness’ names;
g. the names or monikers that may be used when referring to a party or a
witness;
h. identification of “will call” and “may call” witnesses;
i. use of deposition testimony:
5

1. designation of specific testimony by page and line; and
2. identification of the person selected to read deposition answers;
j. use of video depositions:
1. resolution of objections;
2. pretrial redaction, if necessary; and
3. arrangements for necessary equipment to broadcast the
deposition;
k. issues concerning witnesses and exhibits;
l. the allocation of trial time between the parties;
m. the admission of stipulated exhibits or exhibits about which there are
no objections;
n. timing of publication, if any, of trial exhibits to the jury;
o. anticipated evidentiary issues;
p. the necessity for cautionary or limiting instructions;
q. requests or requirement for trial briefs;
r. exemptions from the order of sequestration of witnesses;
s. security precautions, requirements, or issues;
t. training on the use of courtroom technology; and
u. transporting and bringing equipment, models, props, or other property
into the courthouse and courtroom for use during trial;1

1

The court has audio, video, audio-visual, evidentiary presentation, and other special equipment
that may be used by the parties. A listing of available equipment can be found on the District Court’s
website at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx under “Courtroom Technology Manual
for Attorneys.” Arrangements for training on courtroom technology must be made with the courtroom
deputy clerk, Kathleen Finney, at [phone], at least 14 days before trial. Notify the courtroom
deputy clerk no later than fourteen (14) days before the date and time you need such equipment or need
your own equipment to be brought through security for use in the courtroom

6

12. That each side shall be permitted voir dire examination not to exceed 15
minutes following voir dire examination by the court, but shall not reiterate questions
previously propounded by the court or another party;
13. That unless ordered otherwise, the jurors shall not be sequestered before
deliberations;
14. That trial witnesses subject to sequestration under Fed. R. Evid. 615 shall be
sequestered by order entered sua sponte immediately before opening statements;
15. That opening statements shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes per party;
16. That the court will not engage in the examination of any witness, except to
eschew plain error;
17. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard III.B.4.b., each party shall have
available at trial a set of exhibits for the court, the courtroom deputy clerk, opposing
counsel (one set per party), and any pro se party;
18. That objections made in the presence or hearing of the jury, i.e., so-called
“speaking” objections, shall be stated as succinctly as practicable and supported by
recitation of apposite authority when possible; however, neither counsel nor a pro se
party shall speechify an objection in the presence or hearing of the jury [See Fed. R.
Evid. 103(d)];
19. That unless interrupted by the court, in marshaling motions or objections
during trial, the following sequential protocol shall be observed: objection, response,
reply, ruling;
20. That to eliminate or minimize bench or sidebar conferences, each party shall
be responsible to inform the courtroom deputy clerk by the conclusion of a trial day

7

about any issue which should be considered before commencing trial on the next
scheduled day of trial and at the outset of a trial day about any issue which should be
considered at the conclusion of that trial day;
21. That to facilitate preparation, marshaling, and consideration of proposed jury
instructions and verdict forms, the parties shall identify and enumerate each individual
jury instruction in the heading or title as specified in REB Civ. Practice Standard V.C.4.;
provided, furthermore, the parties shall similarly identify and enumerate all proposed
verdict forms and special interrogatories;
22. That closing argument shall be limited to forty-five (45) minutes total for each
party; and
23. That for additional information about courtroom protocol, courtroom
technology and training, trial preparation, transport of items into the courthouse and
courtroom, or submission of trial exhibits, the courtroom deputy clerk, Kathleen Finney,
at [phone], should be contacted.
Dated November 20, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

8