Gabriel v. Colorado Mountain Medical, P.C. et al
Filing
55
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Colorado Mountain Medical PC, Brooks Bock against Cheryl Gabriel re: 54 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Reconsider. By Clerk on 12/23/2014. (alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02261-REB-CBS
CHERI GABRIEL
Plaintiff
v.
COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL, P.C., AND
DR. BROOKS BOCK
Defendant
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider [#54] of
Judge Robert E. Blackburn entered on December 23, 2014 it is
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claim for interference with her right to reinstatement
following FMLA leave in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1) is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment with prejudice is entered on behalf of
defendants, Colorado Mountain Medical, P.C., and Dr. Brooks Bock, and against
plaintiff, Cheri Gabriel, on plaintiff’s claim for interference with her right to reinstatement
following FMLA leave in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with the Order Dismissing All Claims
Except the Claim for an FMLA Interference [#36], filed June 4, 2014 that judgment
with prejudice is also entered on behalf of defendants, Colorado Mountain Medical,
P.C., and Dr. Brooks Bock, and against plaintiff, Cheri Gabriel, on all other claims
previously asserted in this lawsuit. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed
by the clerk of the court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 23rd day of November, 2014.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/
A. Lowe
A. Lowe
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?