MSPBO, LLC v. Adidas North America, Inc. et al
ORDER granting 45 Unopposed Motion for Entry of Agreed PretrialSchedule for the Consolidated Civil Actions, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/7/14.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-02287-PAB-KMT
(Consolidated with Civil Action No. 13-cv-03388-PAB-KMT)
ADIDAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., AND
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Having reviewed MSPBO, LLC’s Unopposed for Entry of Agreed Pretrial
Schedule for the Consolidated Civil Actions (Doc. No. 45), and having found good
cause for the relief requested in the Unopposed Motion, the Court hereby GRANTS the
Unopposed Motion (Doc. No 45).
Accordingly, the following schedule shall govern in consolidated Civil Actions
Nos. 13-cv-02887 and 13-cv-02288:
Joint Invalidity Contentions
Motion to Amend/Join Parties
Exchange Proposed Terms for Claim Construction
Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions
Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement
Completion of Claim Construction Discovery
Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief
Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief
Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief
January 31, 2014
March 7, 2014
March 14, 2014
March 21, 2014
April 11, 2014
May 20, 2014
June 10,2 014
July 11, 2014
July 25, 2014
August 1, 2014
Furthermore, the continued Scheduling Conference set for October 7, 2014
at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S.
Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado in the Scheduling Order in Civil
Action No. 13-cv-02287 (Dkt. No. 27) shall remain in place. A joint proposed
scheduling order with respect to the remainder of the dates in the consolidated
Civil Actions shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the Court no later
than seven (7) days before the continued scheduling conference.
Dated this 7th day of February, 2014
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?