Silva, et al v. US Bank, et al

Filing 38

ORDER: The "Motion to Amend Complaint" (filed January 10, 2014) (Doc. # 34 ) is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 35 ) is accepted for filing on today's date. The "Motion to Dismiss Defendants U.S. Bank, Castle Law G roup, LLC a/k/a Castle Stawiarski, LLC; Larry Castle, in his corporate and individual capacities; George J. Kennedy, Douglas County Public Trustee, in his official capacity, and; MERS, a division of MERS Corp." (filed January 10, 2014) (Doc. # [ 32]) is DENIED as moot, as the listed Defendants are no longer parties in the case pursuant to the Second Amended Complaint. The "Motion of Defendants the Castle Law Group, LLC and Larry Castle to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief Can Be Granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)" (filed September 17, 2013) (Doc. # 7 ) is DENIED as moot, as the moving Defendants are no longer parties in the case. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 1/21/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02289-MSK-CBS MARGARET A. SILVA, and RONALD P. SILVA Plaintiffs, v. US BANK, THE CASTLE LAW GROUP, LLC a/k/a Castle Stawiarski, LLC, LARRY CASTLE, in his corporate capacity, LARRY CASTLE, in his individual capacity, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, GEORGE KENNEDY, Douglas County Public Trustee, and MERS, a division of MERSCORP, Defendants. ORDER Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court on: (1) the “Motion of Defendants the Castle Law Group, LLC and Larry Castle to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief Can Be Granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1);” (2) the “Motion to Dismiss Defendants U.S. Bank, Castle Law Group, LLC a/k/a Castle Stawiarski, LLC; Larry Castle, in his corporate and individual capacities; George J. Kennedy, Douglas County Public Trustee, in his official capacity, and; MERS, a division of MERS Corp.;” and (3) “Motion to Amend Complaint.” Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated September 10, 2013 (Doc. # 5) and the memoranda dated October 9, 2013 (Doc. # 13) and January 21, 2014 (Docs. # 36 and # 37), these matters were referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court having reviewed the Motions, the entire case file, and the proceedings held on December 11, 2013 (see 1 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order (Doc. # 30)) and being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The “Motion to Amend Complaint” (filed January 10, 2014) (Doc. # 34) is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 35) is accepted for filing on today’s date. 2. The “Motion to Dismiss Defendants U.S. Bank, Castle Law Group, LLC a/k/a Castle Stawiarski, LLC; Larry Castle, in his corporate and individual capacities; George J. Kennedy, Douglas County Public Trustee, in his official capacity, and; MERS, a division of MERS Corp.” (filed January 10, 2014) (Doc. # 32) is DENIED as moot, as the listed Defendants are no longer parties in the case pursuant to the Second Amended Complaint. 3. The “Motion of Defendants the Castle Law Group, LLC and Larry Castle to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief Can Be Granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)” (filed September 17, 2013) (Doc. # 7) is DENIED as moot, as the moving Defendants are no longer parties in the case. 4. A Rule 16 Scheduling and Planning Conference will be set by a separate Order. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 21st day of January, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?