Custard v. Allred et al

Filing 110

ORDER granting 104 Motion for Correction of the Record to the extent that it seeks to strike Doc. #102; denying as unnecessary 106 Motion for Order to Correct Court Order; and denying as repetitive of earlier requests 108 Renewed Motion for Rulings, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/21/14.(nmarb, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02296-REB-CBS
BOB CUSTARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID ALLRED,
YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF,
BUREAU OF PRISONS,
CHAVEZ,
CORDOVA,
ENCARANANZE,
FIEF,
ANDREW FENLON,
B. KASDON,
KOCH-COULTER,
PATRICIA RANGEL,
PAUL ZOHN, and
ZONNO,
Defendants.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
This civil action comes before the court on Mr. Custard’s “Request to Appoint
Counsel” (Doc. #102) and “Renewed Motion for Rulings” (Doc. #108). Also before the
court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Correction of the Record” (Doc. #104) and “Motion for
Order to Correct Court Order” (Doc. #106).

Pursuant to the Order Referring Case

dated January 2, 2014 (Doc. # 31) and the memorandums dated September 25, 2014 (Doc.
#103), October 20, 2014 (Doc. #109), October 7, 2014 (Doc. #105), and October 14,
2014 (Doc. #107), respectively, these matters were referred to the Magistrate Judge.
The court has reviewed the matters, the entire case file, and the applicable law and is
sufficiently advised in the premises.
Pursuant to Plaintiff’s request, Doc. #102 is stricken. (See Doc. #104). Plaintiff’s
September 20, 2014 “actual motion,” as referred to in Doc. #104, was docketed as #106,

1

“Motion for Order to Correct Court Order.” The court acknowledges the discrepancy between
Doc. #26 and footnote 3 in Doc. #101, in which the court incorrectly stated that claim 7 had been
dismissed for failure to pay the $400 filing fee. Finally, Mr. Custard’s request for rulings was
addressed in Doc. #101.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Mr. Custard’s “Motion for Correction of the Record” (Doc. #104) is
GRANTED to the extent it seeks to strike Doc. #102. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Custard’s “Request to Appoint Counsel” (Doc. #102) is
STRICKEN. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Custard’s “Motion for Order to Correct Court Order” (Doc.
#106) is DENIED as unnecessary. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Custard’s “Renewed Motion for Rulings” (Doc. #108) is
DENIED as repetitive of earlier requests.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 21st day of October, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge

2