Custard v. Allred et al

Filing 222

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/14/15 re 219 (Motion) Request for Production of Documents, Information, and Things Consistent with F.R.C.P. 26; and 220 (Motion) Request for Admissions. Although they have been docketed as Motions , Docs. No. 219 and 220 are, in actuality, a Request for Production of Documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, and a Request for Admission pursuant to F.R.C.P. 36. Such requests are directed to the Defendants and require no action on the part of the court. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02296-REB-CBS BOB CUSTARD, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ALLRED, YVETTE BROUILLET-FETTERHOFF, BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHAVEZ, CORDOVA, ENCARANANZE, FIEF, ANDREW FENLON, B. KASDON, KOCH-COULTER, PATRICIA RANGEL, PAUL ZOHN, and ZONNO, Defendants. ORDER Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff’s “Request for Production of Documents, Information, and Things Consistent with F.R.C.P. 26” (Doc. 219) and his “Request for Admissions” (Doc. 220). Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated January 2, 2014 (Doc. 31) and the memorandum dated October 14, 2015 (Doc. 221), this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court has reviewed Plaintiff’s filings, the entire case file, and the applicable law and is sufficiently advised in the premises. Although they have been docketed as Motions, Docs. No. 219 and 220 are, in actuality, a Request for Production of Documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, and a Request for Admission pursuant to F.R.C.P. 36. Such requests are directed to the Defendants and require no action on the part of the court.   1 DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 14th day of October, 2015.   BY THE COURT:       s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge   2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?