Mancia Rivera v. Carniceria y Verduleria Guadalajara Inc. et al
Filing
8
ORDER denying 5 MOTION for Leave to Restrict Document filed by Walter Orlando Mancia Rivera, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/17/2013. (skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02309-BNB
WALTER ORLANDO MANCIA RIVERA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CARNICERIA Y VERDULERIA GUADALAJARA INC., and
SERGIO EVANGESLISTA,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS
On August 28, 2013, Plaintiff, through counsel, filed a motion titled “Unopposed
Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s Motion and Declaration for Leave to Proceed
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as a Restricted Document – Level 2” (ECF No. 5). On
September 3, 2013, the Court entered an order (ECF No. 7) allowing Plaintiff ten days
in which to file an amended motion to restrict access that complied with Rule 7.2 of the
Local Rules of Practice for this Court concerning public access to documents and
proceedings. The September 3 order warned Plaintiff that failure to file an amended
motion to restrict access in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 would result in the
denial of the motion to restrict access filed on August 28.
Plaintiff has failed within the time allowed to file an amended motion to restrict
access in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2, or otherwise to communicate in any
way with the Court in response to the September 3 order.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the motion titled “Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s
Motion and Declaration for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as a
Restricted Document – Level 2” (ECF No. 5) that Plaintiff filed through counsel on
August 28, 2013, is denied.
DATED September 17, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?