Adam et al v. MKBS, LLC, et al
Filing
30
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/3/2014. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02316-WJM-MEH
OSMAN ADAM
ABDIRAHEEM AHMED, f/k/a RAHIM AHMED
ABDIKARIN DIRIR
ABDIHAKIM FARAH
HASSAN FARAH
MOHAMUD FARAH
ABSHIR HASSAN
ABSHIR MAHAMED
AHMED OMAR
YESHIMEBET RISKE, and
IBRAHIM YUSUF
Plaintiffs,
v.
MKBS LLC, d/b/a METRO TAXI,
d/b/a METRO TAXI INC., a Colorado limited liability company
Defendant.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
It is anticipated by Plaintiffs and Defendant that certain of Defendant’s
confidential business records and certain of Plaintiffs’ confidential business, income and
personnel records may be produced in discovery in this matter. The parties agree that
such confidential information or information which will improperly annoy, embarrass, or
oppress any party, witness, or person providing discovery in this case, must be
protected from further disclosure or dissemination. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(c), the Court finds good cause for entry of this Stipulated Proposed
Protective Order to provide such protection according to the terms and conditions
1
below.
1.
To expedite the flow of discovery material and the litigation of this case,
facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, and adequately protect
material entitled to be kept confidential, it is, by agreement of the Parties, STIPULATED
and ORDERED that:
2.
This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and
information, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to
interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other
information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery duties created by the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Pilot Project Regarding Initial Discovery
Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.
3.
CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information (collectively
“CONFIDENTIAL information”) shall not, without the consent of the party producing it
and the consent of the party claiming confidentiality (if that party is different from the
producing party) or further Order of the Court, be disclosed or made available in any
way to any person except that such information may be disclosed to:
(a)
attorneys who are actively working on this case;
(b)
persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys
actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in
the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case;
(c)
the parties, including designated representatives for Defendant;
(d)
expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this
proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial, or
2
other proceedings in this case;
(e)
the Court in this case and its employees (“Court Personnel”);
(f)
stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings
necessarily incident to the conduct of this case;
(g)
(h)
4.
deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; and
other persons by written agreement of the parties.
As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil P. 34(a)(1)(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate
document within the meaning of this term.
5.
Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that is
confidential and implicates common law or the statutory privacy interests of Plaintiffs,
current or former employees, representatives, or agent of Defendant, including but not
limited to Defendant’s personnel or business financial information of Defendant,
including, but not limited to personnel information concerning non-party current and
former employees or contractors of Defendant; non-party employee or contractors’
addresses, social security numbers; non-parties’ employment files and compensation
histories; information containing Defendant’s trade secret information; Defendant’s
proprietary or non-public business information; information relating to Defendant’s
investment, business, and operational strategies, plans, and corporate structure
considered by Defendant, by policy or practice, to be confidential or proprietary.
CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except in
pretrial discovery, at the trial, or in preparation for trial, or for any appeals of this action.
6.
Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed
above (other than the individuals listed in paragraphs 3(a) through 3(f)), counsel shall
3
provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a
written acknowledgment (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A) stating that he or she
has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. All such
acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in camera review
by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by opposing counsel.
7.
Counsel or persons regularly employed or associated with counsel may
designate information as CONFIDENTIAL only after a review of the information and
based on a good faith belief that the information is CONFIDENTIAL or otherwise entitled
to protection.
8.
Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on
them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the term “CONFIDENTIAL.”
9.
Production of any document or materials without a designation of
confidentiality or an incorrect designation will not be deemed to waive a later claim as to
its proper designation nor will it prevent the producing party from designating said
document or material “CONFIDENTIAL” at a later date.
10.
In the event that a non-party or another party produces documents that a
party wishes in good faith to designate as CONFIDENTIAL, the party wishing to make
that designation must do so within fifteen (15) business days of receipt, and identify the
CONFIDENTIAL document(s) or CONFIDENTIAL information by bates label or, where
not bates labeled, by document title and page number(s). The non-designating parties
shall thereafter mark the document or information in the manner requested by the
designating party and thereafter treat the document or information in accordance with
such marking. However, any use by the non-designating parties made before a post-
4
production designation will not be a violation of this Protective Order, and the postproduction designation will apply prospectively only and will not apply to any disclosure
made prior to the designation, so long at the non-designating party notifies the
designating party of the prior disclosure and otherwise comes into conformance with the
new designation.
11.
Producing or receiving materials or otherwise complying with the terms of
this Protective Order shall not:
(a)
operate as an admission by any party that any particular discovery
material contains or reflects any CONFIDENTIAL information;
(b)
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the
production of documents it considers not subject to discovery or otherwise
protected from or limited in discovery on the basis of privilege or otherwise;
(c)
prejudice in any way the rights of a party to seek a Court
determination regarding whether particular discovery materials should be
produced; or
(d)
prejudice in any way the rights of a party to apply to the Court for
any additional protection with respect to the confidentiality of information as that
party may consider appropriate.
12.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL
information, the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL
and shall be subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall
be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but a party may
designate all or any portion of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription,
5
provided written notice of the designation is given promptly to all counsel of record
within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the
transcript.
13.
A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL
information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information.
The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the
parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the
notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as
CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion within thirty (30) days after the conclusion
of that 10-business day window requesting that the Court determine whether the
disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a
motion is filed timely, the disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL
under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the
designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed
information shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be
treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with
a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as
CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the
disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
14.
In the event it is necessary for the parties to file CONFIDENTIAL
information with the Court, the CONFIDENTIAL information shall be filed in accordance
with the requirements of D.C.COLO.L.CivR 7.2, with an accompanying Motion to
Restrict Access and a designation of the level of restriction sought.
6
15.
At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed
upon, each document and all copies thereof which have been designated as
CONFIDENTIAL shall be returned to the party that designated it CONFIDENTIAL, or the
parties may elect to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents. Where the parties agree to
return CONFIDENTIAL documents, the returning party shall provide all parties a written
certification of counsel confirming that all CONFIDENTIAL documents have been
returned. Where the parties agree to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents, the
destroying party shall provide all parties with an affidavit confirming the destruction.
This provision shall not preclude the parties from maintaining for their records a secured
electronic copy of any document that is designated as CONFIDENTIAL in this case.
16.
The terms of this Protective Order shall survive the termination of this
action, and all protections of this Protective Order shall remain in full effect in perpetuity.
17.
This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good
cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.
STIPULATED AND APPROVED:
DATED this 3rd day of December, 2013 in Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
s/ Lisa Hogan
Lisa Hogan
7
s/ Thomas J. Arckey
Thomas J. Arckey
Martine T. Wells
Sara Y. Hunt
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Arckey & Associates, LLC
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for Plaintiff
410 Seventeenth Street,
7951 East Maplewood Ave.,
Suite 2200
Suite 285
Denver, CO 80202-4432
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 223-1100
(303) 798-8546
(303) 223-1111 fax
(303) 798-4637 fax
lhogan@BHFS.com
tja@arlaw.us
mwells@BHFS.com
syhunt@arlaw.us
Courtesy copy provided to:
Chris Baumgartner
Dufford & Brown, PC
1700 Broadway, Suite 2100
Denver, CO 80290-2101
(303) 861-8013
Attorney for Interested Party SuperTaxi, Inc.
8
EXHIBIT A
AGREEMENT CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL SUBJECT TO THE
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, the undersigned, hereby acknowledge I have read the Stipulated Protective
Order (the "Order") in Adam, et al., v. MKBS, LLC, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02316-WJMMEH, United States District Court for the District of Colorado. In consideration of being
permitted to review confidential information, as described in the Order, I agree to
comply, and be bound by, the terms set out therein.
I hereby submit myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for
the District of Colorado for the purpose of enforcement of the Order.
_________________________________________
Full Name, Title
_______________________
Signature
9
_________
Date
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?