Hagos v. Raemisch et al
Filing
38
ORDER TO FILE ANSWER AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Within thirty days after the filing of the state court record, Respondents shall file an Answer that complies with this Order. Within thirty days of the filing of the Answer, the Applicant may file a reply if he desires, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/8/16. (ktera)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02375-RPM
ABRAHAM HAGOS,
v.
Applicant,
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of
Corrections,
JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility, and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
Respondents.
__________________________________________________________________
ORDER TO FILE ANSWER AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
__________________________________________________________________
After preliminary consideration of the Application for Writ of
Habeas Corpus Filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, the Court has
determined that an Answer is appropriate.
Respondents are directed to file an Answer addressing any
affirmative defenses such as exhaustion of state court remedies as well
as the merits of the claims raised in the Application. In support of the
Answer, Respondents should attach as exhibits relevant documents
from the state court record.
Applicant may file a reply and attach as exhibits relevant
documents from the state court record. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within thirty days after the filing of the state
court record, Respondents shall file an Answer that complies with this
Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days of the filing of the
Answer, the Applicant may file a reply if he desires.
DATED: March 8, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?