Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.237.22.86

Filing 49

COURTROOOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Compel; Motion Hearing held on 9/11/2014. The plaintiff may search for protected works and for s ophisticated wiping efforts. The plaintiff is to bear the cost of copying the hard drive. Parties are to agree on a Protective Order prior to the defendants hard drive being cloned or reviewed. Status Conference set for 10/14/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Parties may appear by telephone or in person. FTR: MEH Courtroom A105. (mdave)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Civil Action No. 13-cv-2385–WYD-MEH Courtroom Deputy: Molly Davenport Date: August 11, 2014 FTR B Courtroom A501 MALIBU MEDIA L L C Plaintiff, Jason Kotzer vs. MIKE CUDDY Defendant. Carolyn Smith Lindvig COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MOTION HEARING Court in session: 10:04 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance of counsel. Discussion held regarding the Motion to Compel [rec doc 43] ORDERED: Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The plaintiff may search for protected works and for sophisticated wiping efforts. The plaintiff is to bear the cost of copying the hard drive. The defendant can take the deposition of the plaintiff’s expert witness (via telephone/video) regarding concerns of discovery parameters. Parties are to agree on a Protective Order prior to the defendant’s hard drive being cloned or reviewed. Status conference is set for October 14, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. The parties may appear in person or by telephone. Court in recess: 10:32 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 28 minutes To obtain a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?