Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.237.22.86
Filing
70
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion for Protective Order; Motion Hearing held on 1/14/2015. IT IS ORDERED that all deadlines in this case are VACATED. FTR: Courtroom A 501. (mdave )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:
13-cv-02385-WYD-MEH
Molly Davenport
Date: January 14, 2015
FTR: Courtroom A 501
Parties:
Counsel:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC
Jason Kotzker
Plaintiffs,
v.
MIKE CUDDY
Carolyn Lindvig
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
2:06 p.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
ORDERED:
[60] Renewed MOTION to Compel Production of Defendant's Hard Drives and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
[61] MOTION for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
The computer search is to be conducted as proposed by counsel for the plaintiff in the manner to
which his expert is accustomed with the exception of the preview function at this time. The
results/report is to be furnished to counsel for the defendant and the Court at the same time.
Counsel is to review the results and advise the Court of objections.
The only issue left is to determine if Mr. Kotzker’s expert will be allowed to use the preview
function to narrow the possible list of files.
Experts should confer and report back to their respective employers so that counsel can report to
the Court on or before January 26, 2015 regarding specific terms of the proposed Protective
Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all deadlines in this case are VACATED.
2:57 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 00:44
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?