Martensen v. Koch
Filing
212
MINUTE ORDER granting 211 Motion for Leave to file response to Defendant William Koch's Objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's July 29, 2014 Order Compelling Disclosure of Attorney-Client Privileged Communications and Attorney Work Product 198 . By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/26/2014.(trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02411-REB-CBS
KIRBY MARTENSEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM KOCH, and
DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER1
The matter is before the court on Plaintiff Kirby Martensen’s Motion For Leave
to File Response to Defendant William Koch’s Objections to Magistrate Judge
Shaffer’s July 29, 2014 Order Compelling Disclosure of Attorney-Client Privileged
Communications and Attorney Work Product (Dkt. 198) [#211]2 filed August 25,
2014. After reviewing the motion and the record, the court has concluded that the
motion should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff Kirby Martensen’s Motion For Leave to File Response to
Defendant William Koch’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s July 29, 2014
Order Compelling Disclosure of Attorney-Client Privileged Communications and
Attorney Work Product (Dkt. 198) [#211] filed August 25, 2014, is GRANTED; and
2. That plaintiff Martensen is permitted to file a response to defendant Koch’s
objections to the order compelling disclosure of attorney-client privilege communications
and attorney work product. Responses are due in the time prescribed by the Local
Rule (7.1(d).
Dated: August 26, 2014
1
This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.
Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
2
“[#211]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?