Vreeland v. Fisher et al

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Plaintiff's Motion to Verify Service of Complaint Upon Defendants and Motion for Order Directing All Defendants to Answer Complaint. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/2/13.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 13–cv–02422–PAB–KMT DELMART E.J.M VREELAND, II, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS C. FISHER, MD, KAREN A. JOHNSON, MD, DEA ARAGON, JOAN M. SHOEMAKER, HEART OF THE ROCKIES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ROGER WERHOLTZ, THE DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF, MR. WEAVER, KARI BARONI, CDOC/BVCF, H.S.A., and MICHAEL FRENCH, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff’s “Motion to Verify Service of Complaint Upon Defendants and Motion for Order Directing All Defendants to Answer Complaint” (Doc. No. 21, filed November 26, 2013) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants Rick Raemisch and Kerry Baroni have waived service. (Doc. No. 11.) The United States Marshals Service served Defendant Shoemaker (Doc. No. 23) and is in the process of serving Defendant Fisher (Doc. No. 12). The United States Marshals Service has not served Defendants Aragon, French, Johnson, Weaver or Heart of the Rockies Regional Medical Center. (Doc. Nos. 15–19.) The court recognizes that Plaintiff has not moved to proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, the United States Marshals Service is directed to effect service of process on Defendants Aragon, French, Johnson, Weaver or Heart of the Rockies Regional Medical Center. Plaintiff’s motion to require the defendants to answer the Complaint or to require all defendants to answer on a common date is DENIED. The defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. Dated: December 2, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?