Vreeland v. Fisher et al
Filing
308
MINUTE ORDER; 295 Plaintiffs Second Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Submit Reply to Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part. 283 Plaintiffs Motion for an Order Directing Assistant Colorado Attorney General Kristin A. Ruiz, to Appear for Testimony and to Produce Documents at the Hearing set for October 17, 2015 in this Matter is DENIED. 294 Plaintiffs Second Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Submit Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/23/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13BcvB02422BPABBKMT
DELMART E.J.M VREELAND, II,
Plaintiff,
v.
THOMAS C. FISHER, MD,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Second Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Submit Reply to Defendant’s
Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel” (Doc. No. 295) is GRANTED in part.
Plaintiff shall file his response no later than November 6, 2015. The court will rule on the
Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 263) on the papers, without a hearing. As such, Plaintiff’s
“Motion for an Order Directing Assistant Colorado Attorney General Kristin A. Ruiz, to Appear
for Testimony and to Produce Documents at the Hearing set for October 17, 2015 in this Matter”
(Doc. No. 283) is DENIED.
Plaintiff’s “Second Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Submit Response to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 294) is GRANTED in part.
Plaintiff’s response to the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than fourteen
days after this court’s ruling on the Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 263), unless otherwise ordered
by the court in the order on the Motion to Compel.
Dated: October 23, 2015
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?