Brown v. Colvin
Filing
12
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/6/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/5/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 2/20/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 11/26/13. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02428-AP
LINDA MARIE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Ann J. Atkinson
Attorney at Law
7960 S. Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016-1904
(303) 680-1881
(303) 680-7891 (facsimile)
atkinsonAJ@aol.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
-1-
Alexess D. Rea
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7101
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Alexess.rea@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: September 9, 2013
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: September 6, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: November 6, 2013
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties disagree about adequacy and completeness of the record, but the disputed records
and issues related to them will be addressed during the briefing process.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff intends to submit additional evidence (previously submitted to the Appeals Council) as
proposed amendments to the Administrative Record with her Opening Brief. Defendant states
that she cannot stipulate to supplementing the certified administrative record with said evidence,
but has no objection to Plaintiff submitting the evidence with her brief.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not appear to raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties are not aware of any other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: January 6, 2014
-2-
B.
C.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: February 5, 2014
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: February 20, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does/does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 26th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-3-
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Ann J. Atkinson
By: s/ Alexess D. Rea
Ann J. Atkinson
Alexess D. Rea
Attorney at Law
7960 S. Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016-1904
(303) 680-1881
(303) 680-7891 (facsimile)
atkinsonAJ@aol.com
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout St., Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
(303) 844-7101
303) 844-0770 (facsimile)
alexess.rea@ssa.gov
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?