Chorak v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
96
ORDER that Plaintiff Jeffrey Choraks Motion for Addition of Statutory Interest Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) ECF No. 94 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest at a rate of 9% per annum, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/31/2016.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 13-cv-02438-WYD-CBS
JEFFREY CHORAK,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before me on Plaintiff Jeffrey Chorak’s Motion for Addition of
Statutory Interest Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (ECF No. 94). Plaintiff requests that
I amend the final judgment to award prejudgment interest at a rate of 9% per annum.
No response was filed. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
By way of background, following a five-day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict in
favor of the Plaintiff on his claim of premises liability against the Defendant. On
February 9, 2016, Judgment was entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the
Defendant in the amount of $33,648.75. Post-judgment interest was awarded at the
legal rate of 0.52% per annum from the date of the entry of judgment. (ECF No. 90).
Plaintiff seeks an additional award of prejudgment interest at the rate of 9% per annum
from the date the cause of action arose.
A party must make a motion to amend a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment. The Final Judgment was
entered on February 9, 2016. Thus, on March 4, 2016, Plaintiff timely filed the instant
motion. I agree with Plaintiff that prejudgment interest is appropriate under the law and
should be awarded in this case for several reasons.
First, as a federal court sitting in diversity, I apply state law, not federal law, to the
issue of prejudgment interest. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita, 226
F.3d 1138, 1156 (10th Cir. 2000). Under Colorado law, an award of prejudgment
interest is mandatory in personal injury cases such as this matter. Colo. Rev. Stat.
§ 13-21-101; James v. Coors Brewing Co., 73 F. Supp. 2d 1250, 1257 (D. Colo. 1999).
Further, prejudgment interest is an element of compensatory damages. “Courts have
long characterized prejudgment interest as an element of [plaintiff’s] complete
compensation.” Johnson v. Continental Airlines Corp., 964 F.2d 1059, 1062 (10th Cir.
1992) (internal quotations and citations omitted). “Prejudgment interest is normally
designed to make the plaintiff whole and is part of the actual damages sought to be
recovered.” Id.
Second, in his complaint, Plaintiff sought appropriate damages, both
prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs and attorney fees. See Colorado
Performance Corp. v. Mariposa Associates, 754 P.2d 401 (Colo. App. 1987) (holding
that plaintiff’s request for interest in his complaint was sufficient to permit an award of
prejudgment interest). Thus, I find that the final judgment should be amended pursuant
to Rule 59(e) to include prejudgment interest. Accordingly, in light of the fact that
Colorado law determines prejudgment interest in this diversity case, I find that Plaintiffs
are entitled to prejudgment interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1321-101(1).
-2-
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff Jeffrey Chorak’s Motion for Addition of Statutory Interest
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (ECF No. 94) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to
prejudgment interest at a rate of 9% per annum as follows:
Simple interest is awarded pursuant to statute at the rate of 9% per annum from
the date the cause of action arose. After the date the Plaintiff filed his complaint, he is
entitled to compound annual interest. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-101(1).
•
Simple interest at 9% from September 13, 2011 through September 12, 2012 is
$3,028.39.
•
Simple Interest at 9% from September 13, 2012 through September 5, 2013 is
$2,971.40 Verdict plus simple interest is $5,999.79.
•
Compound interest from September 6, 2013 through September 6, 2014 is 9% of
$39,648.54 = $3,568.37; total $43,216.91.
•
Compound interest from September 6, 2014 through September 6, 2015 is 9% of
$43,216.91 = $3,889.52; total $47,106.43
•
Compound interest from September 6, 2015 to February 5, 2016 is 9% of
$47,106.43 = $1,780.62 (152 days); total $48,870.05
•
Post judgment interest added until verdict paid $11.00/day.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the Final
Judgment consistent with this Order.
Dated: March 31, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?