Holloway v. Colvin
ORDER granting 17 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand. This matter is ordered reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration's Appeals Council pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. By Judge John L. Kane on 1/13/14.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2440-AP
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REMAND
THIS MATTER iss before the Court on an unopposed motion by Defendant, the Acting
Commissioner of Social Security, to remand this case to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Court, being fully advised in the premises, HEREBY ORDERS
that the Commissioner’s Motion (doc. #17) is GRANTED.
This matter is ordered reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration’s
Appeals Council pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Upon remand, the Appeals Council shall remand the matter to an Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) for further administrative proceedings. The ALJ will be directed to further consider
Plaintiff s residual functional capacity, and in so doing, evaluate the treating source, non-treating,
and non-examining source opinions, indicating the weight afforded the opinion evidence, giving
no weight or consideration to any residual functional capacity assessment made by a single
decision maker. The Appeals Council will recommend that a new decision be issued based on
the total record.
The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58,
consistent with the decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).
Done this 13th day of January, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane ______________
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?